U.S. Navy Destroyer Carney’s Year of Combat: A Turning Point in Maritime Warfare

By Geoff, Military Times Managing Editor

As the U.S. Navy destroyer Carney set sail across the Atlantic Ocean on October 7, 2023, its crew anticipated a routine deployment. However, events in the Middle East that day would soon catalyze a profound transformation within the Navy. The brutal attack by Hamas militants in Israel, which claimed over 1,200 lives, ignited a series of conflicts that have continued to destabilize the region.

Twelve days later, on October 19, the Carney made history by becoming the first American warship to intercept and neutralize a barrage of missiles and drones launched by Iran-backed Houthi rebels from Yemen. The operation, which unfolded over a tense ten hours, involved the destruction of 15 drones and four cruise missiles aimed at Israel. Commander Jeremy Robertson, the ship’s commanding officer at the time, reflected on the unexpected shift in mission focus, stating, “None of us really could have known what we were going to get into once Oct. 7 happened.”

The past year has thus transformed the Red Sea into a battlefield unlike any faced by the U.S. Navy since World War II, with continuous Houthi attacks necessitating near-daily combat readiness for destroyers operating in the region. Admiral Daryl Caudle, head of Fleet Forces Command, commented on the escalating complexities of global power dynamics and regional aggressions, emphasizing that any minor incident could have major consequences.

In the wake of the October 19 engagement, the Navy has adapted its tactics and enhanced its readiness, developing new combat protocols and technologies in response to the growing threat. Sailors on the Carney gained invaluable experience that connected their rigorous training to real-world combat scenarios. "This really gave our sailors the why," Commander Robertson said, highlighting the importance of understanding the relevance of their training.

Despite the tactical successes, concerns over the sustainability of the Navy’s engagement in the Red Sea are surfacing. Questions arise regarding the extensive usage of munitions against relatively low-cost Houthi drones and the potential implications for the Navy’s preparedness in the event of conflicts with major powers like China. Moreover, the frequency of Houthi attacks has strained not only ship resources but also the operational readiness of Navy aircraft carriers.

While the Navy’s air defense systems have proven effective against various threats, retired Navy officer James Holmes cautions that the larger strategic goals—specifically, ensuring the unhindered movement of merchant vessels through the Red Sea—remain unfulfilled. “The mission has fallen short of its strategic goal,” he noted.

As the Navy continues to adapt to this protracted conflict, experts like Bryan Clark advocate for increased efficiency in tackling Houthi threats through judicious use of resources. They suggest that the Pentagon might need to explore alternatives such as missile defense systems stationed on land to reduce pressure on naval assets.

Reflecting on his tenure aboard the Carney, Commander Robertson remarked on the surreal nature of their experiences, emphasizing the bond formed among the crew and the lasting impact of their combat encounters. As the Navy enters a new chapter of operations in the Red Sea, Admiral Caudle reaffirms a commitment to readiness: “We’re ready for this fight, no matter how long it lasts.”

With the anniversary of Carney’s historic engagement approaching, the unfolding narrative of U.S. naval involvement in the region continues, underscoring its significant role in contemporary maritime warfare.

Putin Shores Up Nuclear Arsenal Amid Rising Tensions in Ukraine Conflict

This year has seen Russian President Vladimir Putin increasingly invoke the specter of nuclear warfare, a strategy aimed at deterring Western support for Ukraine amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions. Citing Russia’s status as holder of the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, Putin has taken several significant steps, including ordering military drills involving tactical nuclear weapons in conjunction with ally Belarus and announcing plans for the production of ground-based intermediate-range missiles that were previously banned under a historic treaty.

With an estimated nuclear inventory of 5,580 warheads—surpassing the U.S. stockpile of 5,044—Russia’s nuclear might is poised as a counterweight against NATO’s conventional military advantages. The Federation of American Scientists notes that approximately 88% of the world’s nuclear arsenal is comprised of U.S. and Russian stockpiles. Under Putin’s leadership since 2000, Russia has systematically upgraded its nuclear forces, which include a triad of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), long-range bombers, and submarines.

Recent developments include the deployment of advanced missile systems such as the heavy, silo-based Sarmat ICBM, colloquially dubbed "Satan II" in the West, and mobile Yars ICBMs, coupling these advancements with a fleet of modernized strategic bombers. Moscow’s battlefield nuclear abilities have also been underscored through high-precision missiles that can be outfitted with conventional or nuclear warheads.

Putin’s latest revisions to Russia’s nuclear doctrine have stirred concern, particularly as they suggest a lowered threshold for using nuclear weapons—now considering conventional attacks supported by nuclear powers as “joint attacks” on Russia. These shifts highlight a more aggressive posture in response to Western arms supplies to Ukraine, suggesting a potential for nuclear escalation should tensions continue to mount.

The 2010 New START treaty, which imposes limits on deployed nuclear warheads and missiles, is set to expire in 2026, with Putin having suspended Russia’s participation earlier this year. Efforts for diplomatic dialogue on arms control have faltered, as tensions between the U.S. and Russia reach historic highs, prompting calls from some Russian hawks to resume nuclear testing—contingent upon U.S. action.

Despite Putin’s rhetoric surrounding modernization and armament, skepticism remains around certain new weapons programs, such as the Burevestnik, a nuclear-powered cruise missile, which has faced technological challenges and safety concerns. The international community remains watchful as these developments unfold against the backdrop of Russia’s ongoing conflict with Ukraine and the shifting landscape of global nuclear strategy.

As the situation evolves, analysts emphasize the critical need for renewed arms control efforts to mitigate the risk of nuclear confrontation and ensure strategic stability.

Ukraine Considers Lifting Drone Export Ban to Boost Local Defense Industry

Milan — In a significant development for the Ukrainian defense sector, the government is contemplating lifting a ban on the export of drone systems to generate much-needed revenue for local manufacturers. Since the onset of the Russian invasion in 2022, Ukraine has prohibited military goods from being exported to ensure that its armed forces remain well-equipped for ongoing defense efforts. However, this policy is beginning to hinder the growth of local defense companies.

Anatolii Khrapchynskyi, Deputy Director General of Piranha Tech, a company that specializes in electronic warfare, radio-jamming, and drone systems, argues that the export ban, while initially beneficial in providing a surge of state orders, is no longer viable for many firms that have evolved from garage-based startups into stable entities capable of fulfilling significant orders.

"The opportunities for private companies to produce weapons have increased, but we’ve reached a point where the state cannot fully procure our expanded capabilities," Khrapchynskyi stated in an interview with Defense News. He highlighted that many firms have relied on their own investments and minimal grants from government entities, such as Brave1, to accelerate their research and development efforts.

As the demand for advanced defense systems escalates on the battlefield, the costs associated with R&D have risen sharply. Consequently, many companies are voicing the need for additional customers beyond the Ukrainian government. According to reports from Ukrainian media, a government working group has been evaluating the risks of re-entering the global arms market since August, exploring conditions that would facilitate this transition.

Khrapchynskyi supports the re-evaluation of the export ban, suggesting that reconnaissance drones could serve as an initial test case for dual-use technologies that benefit both military and civilian applications. He emphasized the importance of maintaining state contracts as a top priority while considering the sale of earlier models that are not state-of-the-art.

However, the potential lifting of the ban raises significant security concerns. There is a fear that Russian forces could seek to acquire information and technology that may lead to the development of countermeasures. Khrapchynskyi expressed caution regarding this possibility, noting that Russia has a track record of circumventing sanctions.

As Ukraine navigates the complexities of balancing military needs with the growth of its defense industry, the debate over lifting the drone export ban highlights the pressing economic and strategic challenges the country faces in its ongoing conflict with Russia.

Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo, a Europe correspondent for Defense News, continues to track developments in military procurement and international security across the region.

Navy Removes Leadership at Yokosuka Ship Repair Facility Amidst Command Concerns

This past weekend, the U.S. Navy terminated the commanding and executive officers of the U.S. Naval Ship Repair Facility and Japan Regional Maintenance Center located in Yokosuka, Japan, due to a reported “loss of confidence in their ability to command.” Capt. Zaldy Valenzuela, the commanding officer, and Cmdr. Art Palalay, his executive officer, were relieved of their duties on Sunday, with the Navy providing minimal details surrounding their removal.

In a statement, the Navy emphasized its commitment to upholding high standards for its leaders, noting, “Naval leaders are entrusted with significant responsibilities to their Sailors and commands.” Following the dismissals, Capt. Dan Lannamann, previously commanding officer of Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center in Norfolk, Virginia, has stepped in as the new head of the facility. Meanwhile, Cmdr. Timothy Emge, the center’s operations officer, is temporarily assuming the role of executive officer.

The Navy typically does not disclose specific reasons behind the firing of commanding officers beyond the general announcement of a loss of confidence, and no further explanations were made available regarding the circumstances leading to Valenzuela and Palalay’s departures.

Capt. Valenzuela’s extensive background includes roles such as ship superintendent, electrical division officer aboard the amphibious assault ship Bonhomme Richard, and combat and communications officer on the amphibious command ship Blue Ridge. Cmdr. Palalay, who joined the Navy in 1993 and was commissioned in 2006, had served as the readiness officer at Commander Naval Surface Forces Pacific before assuming his position at SRF-JRMC in 2023.

The Yokosuka facility is integral to the Navy’s operations, equipped with six dry docks to perform intermediate and depot-level maintenance and repairs for ships within the 7th Fleet. As the Navy continues to prioritize leadership accountability, the recent changes highlight the challenges and scrutiny that come with managing critical naval resources and personnel.

U.S. Defense Secretary Unveils $400 Million Security Aid Package During Surprise Visit to Kyiv

U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin made an unannounced trip to Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, on Monday, where he met with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to announce a new $400 million security aid package. This marks the second such package offered within a week, emphasizing the ongoing support from the U.S. in the face of Russia’s aggressive military actions.

The latest package includes vital supplies such as artillery, munitions, armored vehicles, and anti-tank weapons, notably the shoulder-launched Javelin system. During their meeting, Austin and Zelenskyy discussed Ukraine’s "victory plan," which envisions an eventual end to the war but hinges on sustained Western support, including aspirations for NATO membership and ongoing military assistance.

While the U.S. has reaffirmed its commitment to assisting Ukraine, it has yet to issue an immediate invitation for Ukraine to join NATO or to grant permission for Ukraine to utilize Western weaponry in strikes deep into Russian territory. Zelenskyy expressed optimism in a social media post, highlighting discussions on enhancing Ukraine’s air defense and expanding the use of long-range weaponry against Russian military targets.

Last week, the White House announced a separate $425 million package, which included hundreds of crucial air defense interceptors slated to arrive in the coming months. Despite these bolstered efforts, the Ukrainian president acknowledges the stark realities on the ground as Russian forces advance, particularly in eastern Ukraine. Ukraine continues to strive for the restoration of territories lost since the onset of the war, including Crimea, seized by Russia in 2014.

As the conflict escalates, senior Pentagon officials report that Russian casualties have surged, now totaling around 600,000 since the conflict began. Austin’s visit to Kyiv, his fourth during his tenure as Secretary of Defense, underscores his commitment to Ukraine’s defense—a pivotal aspect of his leadership as he prepares to conclude his service.

Over the past two and a half years, the U.S. has provided more than $61 billion in security aid to Ukraine, with Austin playing a crucial role in coordinating international support through a monthly forum in Ramstein, Germany.

As both nations grapple with the ongoing crisis, the need for resilient and effective defense strategies remains paramount.

Poland Considers Acquisition of Heavy-Lift Helicopters, Eyeing U.S. Export

WARSAW, Poland — In a significant move for its military capabilities, Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz has revealed that Poland is exploring plans to purchase heavy-lift helicopters, potentially paving the way for further U.S. arms exports to the nation.

During an interview with the local news site Portal Obronny, Kosiniak-Kamysz highlighted Boeing’s CH-47F Chinook as a strong contender, praising its "unique and immense" capabilities. Although the minister did not specify the number of helicopters under consideration, he emphasized the need for larger aircraft that can efficiently transport personnel and equipment to hard-to-reach areas.

"I believe that [the Polish military] also needs larger helicopters which could provide efficient support by transporting ‘big bags,’ or soldiers, into locations that are difficult to access,” he stated. Kosiniak-Kamysz noted the dual-use potential of the Chinook helicopters, particularly in light of the recent flooding incidents in Poland’s southwestern regions, which mobilized approximately 14,000 soldiers for disaster relief efforts.

Boeing is actively promoting the Chinook in the Polish market, having showcased the aircraft at the MSPO defense industry show, the largest of its kind in Poland, held from September 2 to 5 in Kielce.

Should Poland proceed with the acquisition of Chinook helicopters, it would mark yet another significant transaction between the country and Boeing. In August 2024, the Polish government signed a contract with the United States for the procurement of 96 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters and associated gear, a deal valued at around $10 billion.

As Poland continues to enhance its military capabilities, the potential helicopter purchase underscores the country’s commitment to strengthening its defense infrastructure in collaboration with U.S. manufacturers.

Army Clarifies Future of PT Uniform: Black and Gold Gear Here to Stay

In a recent clarification, the U.S. Army has dispelled rumors regarding a redesign of its iconic black and gold physical training (PT) uniform. Following comments made by Sergeant Major of the Army Michael Weimer at the Association of the U.S. Army’s Annual Meeting, the Army confirmed that the existing PT gear will remain unchanged, with no overhaul planned.

During his remarks last week, Weimer indicated that the Army was "redesigning the Army PTs," suggesting potential changes to the standard workout attire. However, the Army clarified on Monday that Weimer’s statements were misinterpreted. Instead of a complete revamp, the intention is to offer soldiers additional options for workout clothing to enhance comfort and fit, addressing specific feedback from the ranks.

According to Weimer, the goal is to allow soldiers to have more choices without incurring additional costs through a full uniform redesign. "It really comes down to fit," Weimer said, emphasizing the importance of performance and functionality in soldiers’ training attire.

As part of this initiative, Sergeant Major Rob Haynie will lead a review process to assess potential alternatives over the coming year. Initial feedback indicates that soldiers have specific complaints about the current shorts, including issues with fit and a lack of pockets for essential items like ID cards.

The Army’s plan includes gathering soldier input and reviewing existing clothing options from the industry. Recommendations for additional PT gear are expected to be presented to senior leaders by the end of 2025. Despite the upcoming options, soldiers will still receive their traditional PT uniforms during basic training and will continue to use them through advanced individual training.

The current gear, consisting of short-sleeve and long-sleeve T-shirts, shorts, pants, and jackets in the distinctive black and gold color scheme, is set to remain unchanged. The Army’s previous uniform update occurred in 2017, transitioning from a black and gray design.

In closing, Weimer asserted, "The black and gold design is here to stay," while also highlighting that any new options approved will still conform to Army regulations, maintaining uniformity and appearance among troops.