In a major counter-insurgency success, the Assam Rifles neutralized 10 militants and recovered a large cache of weapons during a high-risk operation near New Samtal village in Manipur’s Chandel district on May 14, 2025. The village lies close to the Indo-Myanmar border, an area known for insurgent activity and cross-border smuggling.
According to a statement from the PRO Defence, Kohima, the operation was based on specific intelligence inputs regarding the movement of armed groups in the area. Troops from an Assam Rifles unit operating under the Spear Corps launched the operation in the Khengjoy Tehsil of Chandel, a remote and insurgency-prone region.
The forces seized seven AK-47 rifles, one M4 carbine, one RPG launcher, four single-barrel breech-loading (SBBL) rifles, and a substantial quantity of ammunition and war-like stores. The identities and affiliations of the slain militants have not yet been disclosed, and investigations are ongoing.
Security officials highlighted that the porous Indo-Myanmar border continues to pose a significant security challenge. Following the 2021 military coup in Myanmar, the region has seen a rise in smuggling, arms trafficking, and militant activity. The recent operation represents a significant blow to these networks, disrupting potential threats to the region’s fragile stability.
The Assam Rifles’ swift and decisive action has been widely praised for its contribution to maintaining order in Manipur, a state long plagued by ethnic tensions and insurgent violence. Officials believe that the recovered weapons could provide valuable leads into the broader networks enabling insurgent activities in northeast India.
Further updates are expected as authorities continue their investigation into the militant group’s background and potential links across the border.
In a move reflecting heightened military and strategic concerns, Pakistan is reportedly preparing to relocate its Army General Headquarters (GHQ) from Rawalpindi’s Chaklala area to the capital city of Islamabad. The decision follows precision Indian airstrikes on Nur Khan Airbase on May 10, 2025, which caused significant damage to one of Pakistan’s most crucial military installations.
The Indian military action, part of the recently launched Operation Sindoor, was conducted in response to a deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, that claimed 26 lives. Between 1:05 AM and 1:30 AM on May 7, Indian forces carried out targeted strikes on terror camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). Though Indian officials maintained that only militant facilities were targeted and that care was taken to avoid civilian or military infrastructure, Pakistan reported casualties among civilians, further escalating tensions.
Among the most heavily hit was Nur Khan Airbase, located less than 10 kilometers from Pakistan’s current GHQ. Satellite images showed a 19-foot radius crater on the runway and significant damage to key military transport assets, including C-130 Hercules and Il-78 refuelling aircraft. Additional Indian strikes on Mushaf Airbase in Sargodha rendered several runways non-functional, with craters as large as 15 feet observed on satellite surveillance.
The proximity of Nur Khan Airbase to the GHQ is now being seen as a strategic vulnerability. Though the GHQ relocation plan dates back to 2017, recent events appear to have expedited its implementation. According to defense sources, shifting to Islamabad could enhance inter-service coordination while also placing the army headquarters closer to diplomatic and international missions — a factor seen by some analysts as a potential deterrent against future strikes.
The move comes amid rising pressure on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s government, which reportedly reached out to New Delhi seeking a ceasefire after three days of cross-border hostilities. Meanwhile, international actors have stepped in to urge restraint. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed serious concern over the India-Pakistan escalation during a recent Prime Minister’s Questions session in Parliament and offered to support mediation efforts.
The conflict has also impacted civilian life across the subcontinent. Commercial air traffic in parts of northern India was suspended temporarily, with Gwalior’s Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia airport among those affected until May 9. In Pakistan, the military now faces a dual challenge — responding to external military pressure while managing longstanding internal threats, including repeated Taliban attacks on the GHQ since 2007.
As Islamabad braces for what could be a major structural shift in its military infrastructure, the unfolding developments mark a pivotal moment in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. The GHQ relocation, while strategic, underscores the deepening security anxieties amid growing India-Pakistan tensions.
The ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan, initially set to expire on May 10, has been extended until May 18. The announcement was made by Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and confirmed through ongoing communications between military officials of both countries.
The extension follows the agreement reached on May 10 between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of India and Pakistan. According to the Indian Army, both sides have been implementing confidence-building measures and are now working toward reducing the “alertness level” along the Line of Control (LoC) and other sensitive areas.
“The Indian Army continues to uphold the understanding between the DGMOs and will gradually implement de-escalation steps,” said a senior army official. Hotline communications between the two militaries were held on May 12 and May 14 to reinforce the ceasefire, although the Indian side has yet to officially confirm details of the May 14 conversation.
The decision to extend the ceasefire comes in the wake of heightened tensions after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that left 26 civilians dead. In response, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure across Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) and within Pakistan.
Pakistan responded with a series of cross-border attacks from May 8 to May 10, which were effectively countered by Indian retaliatory strikes. The ceasefire initiative marks a crucial attempt to prevent further escalation and foster stability along the border.
Reports suggest both sides have agreed to avoid any provocative actions, including even a single round of firing, and to explore options for reducing troop deployments in forward areas.
This development signals a cautious step toward restoring normalcy after weeks of cross-border conflict, with both militaries acknowledging the need for restraint and ongoing dialogue.
A senior officer of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) lost his life after being struck by lightning during an anti-Maoist operation in the forested Chhotanagra region of West Singhbhum district on the night of May 15. The officer, Second-in-Command Maharabam Prabo Singh of the 26th Battalion, hailed from Manipur and was known for his dedication to service.
The incident occurred around 10:30 PM near Keriburu village during heavy rainfall. The CRPF unit was conducting a routine anti-insurgency operation when the lightning strike took place. Assistant Commandant Subir Kumar Mandal, who was accompanying Singh, suffered serious injuries and was rushed to Tata Main Hospital in Noamundi for treatment. Two personnel from the Jharkhand Police were also injured.
The sudden loss of Maharabam Prabo Singh has sent ripples of grief through the CRPF and the wider security community. In a statement, the force said, “We offer heartfelt tributes to the brave officer who laid down his life in the line of duty under such unfortunate circumstances. The entire force stands in solidarity with the bereaved family during this moment of profound grief.”
West Singhbhum is one of Jharkhand’s most sensitive Maoist-affected areas, with operations often complicated by dense forests, rugged terrain, and unpredictable weather conditions. Natural hazards like lightning have been a recurring threat in the state; only last month, four people died in similar incidents in Hazaribag district.
Maharabam Prabo Singh’s death also draws attention to the service of personnel from conflict-hit regions like Manipur. A member of the Meitei community, Singh served far from home despite the ongoing ethnic tensions in Manipur, which have claimed over 220 lives since 2024 due to clashes between Meitei and Kuki groups.
Security forces continue their efforts to dismantle Maoist networks in the region, with plans to expand presence through new camps in the Saranda forest area. However, this tragic incident underscores the varied and often unpredictable risks faced by personnel operating in India’s internal conflict zones.
Rolo, a two-year-old female Belgian Shepherd deployed with the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), died after being stung nearly 200 times by a swarm of bees during a massive anti-Maoist operation in the Korgotalu hills on April 27. The dog was the only casualty among security personnel during the 21-day operation that concluded on May 11.
Officials said Rolo was assigned to sniff out explosives and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) during the mission, considered one of the largest coordinated efforts against Maoists by the CRPF and Chhattisgarh Police. The operation reportedly dealt a significant blow to Maoist forces, with 31 insurgents killed and 18 security personnel injured, some seriously.
The incident occurred when Rolo and her team were navigating the dense jungles along the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border, a region marked by treacherous terrain, wild animals, and natural hideouts often used by Maoist fighters. During a search operation, the unit was unexpectedly swarmed by bees.
Despite efforts by her handlers to protect her with a polythene cover, bees infiltrated the covering. Overwhelmed by pain and confusion, Rolo broke free, exposing herself to additional stings. She fell unconscious and was immediately evacuated, but despite emergency medical aid, she succumbed to her injuries en route to a veterinary facility.
Trained at the CRPF’s canine training centre in Taralu near Bengaluru, Rolo had been deployed in Chhattisgarh in April 2024. Her service was recognised with a posthumous commendation medal awarded by the Director General of the CRPF.
Security officials mourned the loss of what they called a “four-legged soldier” and highlighted the critical role such animals play in high-risk operations. Rolo’s death underscores the unpredictable dangers faced by both personnel and service animals in anti-insurgency missions.
In a landmark development for military healthcare in India, a cutting-edge Femto-LASIK Suite was inaugurated at the Army Hospital (Research and Referral) in Delhi Cantonment. The new facility was unveiled by Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin, Director General of Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS), and Lieutenant General Sadhna S Nair, Director General of Medical Services (Army), in the presence of senior military officials and dignitaries.
This state-of-the-art suite employs advanced femtosecond laser technology for vision correction, offering unparalleled precision and customization for the treatment of refractive errors and corneal diseases. The technology allows for a minimally invasive procedure, faster recovery times, and enhanced visual outcomes—ideal for young and middle-aged adults in the armed forces who require peak visual performance for operational readiness.
DG, Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS) Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin and DG, Medical Services (Army) Lt Gen Sadhna S Nair inaugurated a state-of-the-art Femto-LASIK Suite at Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt—AFMS’s apex centre. This cutting-edge laser tech offers customised… pic.twitter.com/Jq2JY49JWA
— Ministry of Defence, Government of India (@SpokespersonMoD) May 16, 2025
The inauguration ceremony blended tradition and technology, with the venue adorned with marigold garlands symbolizing auspicious beginnings. A guided tour of the facility followed, highlighting its transformative potential for eye care within the military health system.
Surgeon Vice Admiral Arti Sarin, the first woman to hold the post of DGAFMS, stressed the role of technological integration in supporting the well-being of soldiers and their families. Lt Gen Sadhna S Nair, also a trailblazer as the first woman DGMS (Army), emphasized the broader impact of such advancements in raising the standard of clinical infrastructure within the armed forces.
The Femto-LASIK Suite is part of a global trend in military medicine, aligning with initiatives like the U.S. Army’s Vision Research Program, which addresses vision injuries among service members. With this development, the Army Hospital (R&R) reinforces its position as a leader in military medical innovation, ensuring that India’s defense personnel receive world-class care tailored to their unique service needs.
India’s current air defence capabilities are a mix of advanced imported systems and indigenous technologies. Key among these are the Russian S-400 Triumf missile system, which India inducted starting in 2021 to counter aerial threats from Pakistan and China. Indigenous systems like the Akash missile, developed by DRDO, provide short-to-medium range surface-to-air defence, while the Israel-India joint venture Barak-8 missile system offers medium-range interception capabilities. Other systems such as the Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile (QRSAM) and the upcoming XRSAM reflect India’s push toward self-reliance in air defence.
The S-500 ‘Prometey’ system is Russia’s next-generation air defence missile system, designed to supersede the S-400. Originating from Russia’s Almaz-Antey defense company, the S-500 boasts enhanced capabilities including interception of hypersonic missiles, ballistic missiles, stealth aircraft, and even low-orbit satellites, indicating potential anti-satellite (ASAT) functionality. It has a longer range and faster response time than the S-400, with detection and engagement ranges up to 600 km for air targets and 500 km for ballistic missiles.
This question is particularly relevant now due to evolving regional security dynamics in Asia, including China’s rapid missile advancements (notably hypersonic weapons), ongoing tensions with Pakistan, and an intensifying arms race. India’s need to maintain technological edge and strategic deterrence amid these changing threat perceptions makes the consideration of acquiring the S-500 timely.
What is the S-500 System?
The S-500 Prometey is a highly advanced Russian surface-to-air missile system developed to counter next-generation aerial threats. It can intercept a wide spectrum of targets including ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles traveling at speeds up to Mach 20, stealth aircraft, and satellites in low Earth orbit. The system can track and engage up to 100 targets simultaneously, surpassing the S-400’s capacity of 80 targets.
Key capabilities include:
Engagement range of approximately 600 km for air targets and 500 km for ballistic missiles.
Interceptors operate at altitudes exceeding 185 km, allowing destruction of high-altitude targets including satellites.
Response time of 3-4 seconds, significantly faster than the S-400’s 9-10 seconds.
Potential anti-satellite (ASAT) capability, making it a strategic asset in space warfare.
Ability to counter emerging hypersonic threats, which are difficult to intercept with older systems.
S-500 Air Defence System
India’s Existing Air Defence Infrastructure
India’s air defence network is layered and diverse with major equipments as:
S-400 Triumf: Acquired from Russia, deployed primarily in Punjab to counter threats from Pakistan and China. It can track over 100 targets and intercept missiles and aircraft up to 400 km away.
Akash Missile System: An indigenous short-to-medium-range surface-to-air missile system developed by DRDO with about 96% indigenous content. It is mobile and capable of engaging multiple aerial targets simultaneously, including drones and missiles.
QRSAM: Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile system developed indigenously for rapid deployment and defense against low-level aerial threats.
XRSAM: Under development, intended to provide long-range surface-to-air missile coverage with indigenous technology.
Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) Program: India has Phase I and II of its BMD program aimed at intercepting ballistic missiles at various altitudes.
Barak-8: A joint India-Israel medium-range surface-to-air missile system capable of intercepting fighter jets, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and UAVs. It has a range of 70-100 km and is deployed on naval and land platforms.
These systems collectively contribute to a multi-layered defence architecture that blends indigenous production with strategic imports, supporting India’s goal of defence autonomy under the Make in India initiative.
Difference between S-400 and S-500
Here are the key differences between the Russian S-400 and S-500 air defence missile systems:
Feature
S-400
S-500
Range
Up to 400 km for air targets
Up to 600 km for air targets; 500-600 km for ballistic missiles
Target Tracking & Engagement
Can track up to 80 targets simultaneously; engage 6 targets at once
Can track and engage up to 100 targets simultaneously; engage 10 hypersonic targets at once
Interception Speed
Intercepts targets up to Mach 14
Intercepts targets up to Mach 20
Missile Types
Uses 40N6, 48N6, 9M96E, 9M96E2 missiles
Uses advanced missiles including 40N6E and 77N6 kinetic hit-to-kill interceptors
Altitude Engagement
Effective against ballistic missiles and aircraft at lower altitudes (below ~30-40 km)
Can engage targets at altitudes up to 180-200 km (near space)
Hypersonic & Space Capabilities
Not specifically designed for hypersonic or space threats
Designed to intercept hypersonic missiles and low Earth orbit satellites; has anti-satellite (ASAT) capability
Response Time
Approximately 9-10 seconds
Faster response time of 3-4 seconds
Interception Method
Blast-fragmentation warheads
Kinetic hit-to-kill interceptors for higher precision and lethality
Radar & Detection
Advanced multi-frequency radar capable of tracking stealth aircraft
Jam-proof, multi-frequency radar capable of tracking stealth and near-space targets with longer detection range (up to 2000 km for ballistic targets)
In summary, the S-500 is a next-generation system that significantly extends the range, speed, and altitude envelope of the S-400. It adds advanced capabilities to counter hypersonic missiles and space-based threats such as satellites, which the S-400 cannot. The S-500 also features faster response times and more precise kinetic kill interceptors, making it a strategic game-changer for modern air and missile defence.
Strategic Arguments In Favour of Buying S-500
Enhanced Defence Against China and Pakistan: The S-500’s ability to counter hypersonic missiles and ballistic threats aligns with the need to neutralize advanced Chinese missile systems like the DF-17. It would add a critical upper layer to India’s air defence, complementing the S-400 and indigenous systems.
Deterrence Value: Possession of cutting-edge interception technology strengthens India’s deterrence posture by complicating adversaries’ attack plans.
Technology Access: Procuring the S-500 could open avenues for technology transfer or co-development with Russia, benefiting India’s own missile programs.
Future-Proofing: As space and hypersonic threats grow, the S-500’s ASAT and hypersonic interception capabilities prepare India for next-generation warfare challenges.
Arguments Against Buying S-500
High Cost: The S-500 is expected to be significantly more expensive than the S-400, potentially straining India’s defence budget.
Dependence on Russia: Continued reliance on Russian technology could be risky amid geopolitical uncertainties and sanctions regimes.
Impact on India-US Relations: Further Russian arms purchases risk triggering CAATSA sanctions from the US and may strain India’s strategic partnerships within the QUAD framework.
Redundancy/Overlap: India recently inducted the S-400 and is advancing indigenous BMD and missile systems, possibly reducing the immediate need for the S-500.
Setback to Indigenous Development: Buying the S-500 might slow down or overshadow indigenous projects like XRSAM, affecting long-term self-reliance goals.
Geopolitical and Diplomatic Considerations
India’s historic defence ties with Russia remain strong but Russia’s technological edge is perceived as declining compared to Western systems. India must balance its strategic autonomy with maintaining good relations with the West, especially the US, which provides advanced technology and supports India’s regional ambitions. Procuring the S-500 could complicate this balancing act, affecting India’s global image and defence diplomacy. The potential US pushback over CAATSA sanctions remains a key diplomatic risk.
Integrating the S-500 with India’s existing radar networks, command-and-control systems, and space tracking infrastructure poses challenges. The system’s advanced capabilities require sophisticated radar and space surveillance assets to fully utilize its long-range and ASAT features. Additionally, logistics, maintenance, training, and lifecycle support for such a complex system would demand significant investment and coordination.
Alternatives to Buying S-500
Enhance Indigenous Programs: Accelerate development and deployment of XRSAM and Phase II BMD to build a self-reliant layered defence.
Western Cooperation: Increase collaboration with Western countries for integrated air defence technologies and space-based capabilities like THAAD.
Invest in Space and Electronic Warfare: Develop space surveillance, electronic warfare, and cyber capabilities to complement missile defence.
S-500 vs THAAD
Feature
S-500 (Russia)
THAAD (USA)
Primary Role
Multi-role air defense and anti-ballistic missile system capable of intercepting aircraft, cruise missiles, hypersonic missiles, ballistic missiles, and low Earth orbit satellites (ASAT capability).
Terminal-phase ballistic missile defense system designed specifically to intercept medium- to intermediate-range ballistic missiles during their terminal descent.
Interception Range
Up to 400-600 km against air and ballistic missile targets (varies by source); approx. 500 km for air targets, 400 km for ballistic missiles.
Approx. 200-250 km interception range against ballistic missiles.
Detection Range
Radar detection up to 800 km for targets; can track stealth and hypersonic threats.
Radar detection up to 1000 km; superior in early detection of subtle targets (700 km detection for stealth targets).
Altitude Engagement
Can engage targets at altitudes up to 180-200 km (near-space and low Earth orbit).
Intercepts targets up to 150-200 km altitude in the terminal phase of ballistic missile flight.
Interception Speed
Extremely high interceptor speed (~7200 m/s).
Interceptor speed around 5400 m/s.
Interception Method
Uses conventional warheads with blast-fragmentation effect (explodes near target to disable it).
Kinetic hit-to-kill interceptor that destroys targets by direct collision using kinetic energy.
Simultaneous Target Engagement
Can engage up to 10 ballistic or hypersonic targets simultaneously.
Can engage multiple targets but generally fewer simultaneous engagements compared to S-500.
Mobility
Road-mobile system with transporter-erector-launchers (10×10 chassis).
Mobile, truck-mounted launcher system.
Versatility
Multi-domain: capable of intercepting hypersonic missiles, stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and satellites.
Specialized for ballistic missile defense; limited capability against maneuverable or aerodynamic targets like aircraft.
Operational Status
Recently tested and deployed in limited numbers; cutting-edge system with some capabilities still classified.
Fully operational and deployed by the US and allied countries since early 2010s.
Cost & Development
Newer system with potentially high acquisition and maintenance costs; developed from scratch with new radars and missiles.
Expensive system with over $15 billion R&D investment; well-established technology.
S-500 is a next-generation, multi-role air and missile defence system with extended range, higher altitude engagement, and broader target spectrum including hypersonic missiles and satellites. It uses conventional warheads and emphasizes versatility and rapid response.
THAAD is a specialized terminal-phase ballistic missile defense system with superior detection range and kinetic hit-to-kill interceptors, optimized to destroy incoming ballistic missiles at high altitudes during their descent. It excels in early detection and precise interception but is less versatile against other aerial threats.
While both systems serve missile defense roles, the S-500 offers a more comprehensive air defense umbrella including space and hypersonic threats, whereas THAAD is focused on high-altitude terminal interception of ballistic missiles with kinetic kill technology.
THAAD Air Defence System
Conclusion
The S-500 represents a leap forward in air and missile defence technology with capabilities well-suited to counter emerging threats from hypersonic and space-based weapons. Strategically, it would enhance India’s deterrence and future-proof its air defence. However, the high cost, geopolitical risks, potential impact on indigenous development, and integration challenges warrant careful consideration.
Given India’s recent S-400 induction and ongoing indigenous efforts, a balanced approach emphasizing long-term self-reliance and strategic autonomy may be preferable. India could consider waiting for the S-500 to mature further while investing in Make in India initiatives and diversifying defence partnerships to maintain a robust, future-ready air defence posture.
A fresh twist has emerged in the ongoing counter-terror operations in Jammu and Kashmir as Pakistan-backed terrorist outfit Hizbul Mujahideen has claimed responsibility for three militants killed in an encounter earlier today in Tral, Pulwama district. The claim was made via a propaganda poster released by the group, prominently displaying the Pakistani flag alongside their emblem, once again underscoring the group’s deep ties to Islamabad.
The encounter occurred in the Nadir village of Tral in South Kashmir after Indian security forces launched a cordon and search operation based on specific intelligence inputs about the presence of two to three terrorists. The ensuing gunfight led to the elimination of three individuals, whom officials initially confirmed as active militants.
However, the situation took a complicated turn as conflicting claims emerged regarding the affiliations of the slain terrorists. While Hizbul Mujahideen has publicly identified them as its operatives, multiple credible sources, have reported that the deceased were linked to another Pakistan-based terror outfit — Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). Among the deceased were Aamir Nazir Wani (20) and Yawar Ahmed Bhat, both reportedly active since 2024 under JeM’s banner in the Pulwama region.
This contradiction points to the increasingly blurred lines between militant outfits operating in the Kashmir Valley. Analysts suggest the overlap could be due to dual or shifting allegiances among cadres, or perhaps internal competition and propaganda strategies aimed at asserting dominance and relevance.
Hizbul Mujahideen, formed in 1989 under the guidance of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the Jamaat-e-Islami, has historically sought Kashmir’s merger with Pakistan. It has been designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. Department of State and remains a key actor in the valley’s insurgency. Yet, recent reports indicate that the group has been losing support locally, particularly due to its opposition to pro-independence and Sufi ideological strains, unlike more flexible groups like TRF (The Resistance Front), which comprises members from both Hizbul and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
JeM, on the other hand, founded in 2000 by UN-designated terrorist Masood Azhar, has been responsible for multiple high-casualty attacks, including the 2001 suicide bombing of the J&K legislative assembly. The group has maintained close operational ties with Pakistani intelligence and military establishments.
The propaganda war, as seen in today’s Hizbul poster, is part of a broader effort by terror groups to assert narrative control over the insurgency amid changing ground realities. Security experts highlight this as a renewed indication of Pakistan’s direct sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, with Indian authorities calling for stronger global pressure to dismantle terror infrastructure on Pakistani soil.
As investigations into the identities and affiliations of the slain militants continue, the region remains on high alert. Authorities have increased surveillance and appealed to citizens to stay vigilant as counter-terror operations intensify across South Kashmir.
This incident, once again, reflects the evolving and complex nature of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir — a landscape where propaganda, proxy warfare, and political interests intersect dangerously.
In a significant development following a week of heightened military tensions, the Indian Army has announced the continuation of confidence-building measures (CBMs) with Pakistan. The announcement follows a mutual understanding reached during a meeting between the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both countries on May 10, 2025. According to an official Army statement, the CBMs are aimed at reducing troop alertness levels in forward areas and preventing further escalation along the Line of Control (LoC).
The renewed commitment to CBMs comes on the heels of Operation Sindoor, launched by India on May 7, in response to a deadly terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. The operation, involving missile strikes on targets across the border, resulted in significant casualties—26 dead and 46 injured, according to Pakistani officials—prompting Islamabad to label the strikes as an “act of war.”
Tensions were already high following Pakistan’s May 3 test of the Abdali Weapon System, a ballistic missile with a 450 km range. The launch, interpreted by Indian defence analysts as a signal of aggression, had set the stage for the confrontation that ensued.
However, a breakthrough was achieved on May 10 with the announcement of a U.S.-mediated ceasefire, confirmed by President Donald Trump. The ceasefire was followed by DGMO-level talks on May 12, during which both sides pledged to scale back their military deployments and work toward stabilizing the border.
Despite this diplomatic progress, India reported ceasefire violations shortly after the agreement, leading to a swift and stern retaliatory response by Indian forces. The Ministry of External Affairs condemned Pakistan’s actions and reiterated that peace cannot be sustained without complete cessation of cross-border terrorism.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized that while India remains committed to peace and dialogue, it will not tolerate any acts of aggression or terrorism sponsored from across the border. He reaffirmed the nation’s readiness to respond decisively to any provocation.
Concerns over new technological threats have also emerged, with Indian Army officials highlighting the deployment of Turkish-made drones by Pakistani forces. Unidentified drones were spotted over Jammu’s Samba and Punjab’s Jalandhar districts on May 13, though officials later stated that the situation had stabilized.
Meanwhile, the humanitarian cost of the recent conflict remains evident. Residents in three border districts of Kashmir have been relocated due to earlier shelling by Pakistani forces. The Indian Army has provided support to affected civilians, and efforts are ongoing to ensure their safety.
Security analysts caution that while the extension of CBMs is a welcome move, past experiences show that trust between India and Pakistan remains fragile. Previous agreements have frequently broken down amid accusations and violations.
The coming days and weeks will be crucial in assessing whether this latest effort to de-escalate can endure, or whether the region is once again on the brink of renewed confrontation.
The Ministry of Defence, Government of India, today announced the commencement of the fourth round of registrations for setting up new Sainik Schools nationwide. This step is part of the government’s broader vision to expand the network of Sainik Schools through collaboration with State Governments, NGOs, and private sector partners.
The registration window opened on May 15 and will remain open until June 14, 2025. The ambitious plan to establish 100 additional Sainik Schools seeks to merge the traditional board curriculum with the unique “Academic-Plus” model that the Sainik Schools follow. This model emphasizes discipline, leadership, and national pride, aiming to nurture students not only as future defense personnel but also as responsible citizens.
Ministry of Defence has opened the 4th round of registration of new #SainikSchools through the portal https://t.co/Ea9304esvy. Interested schools are invited to join the Govt’s initiative of setting up 100 New Sainik Schools in partnership with State Govts/NGOs/Private sector.…
— Ministry of Defence, Government of India (@SpokespersonMoD) May 15, 2025
Since their inception in 1961, Sainik Schools have played a crucial role in training over 7,000 officers for India’s defense forces, feeding into premier institutions such as the National Defence Academy (NDA) and the Indian Naval Academy. Currently, 33 Sainik Schools operate across the country, offering CBSE-affiliated residential programs known for their rigorous academics and military-oriented training.
The expansion of these schools aligns with the vision articulated in the 2021 Union Budget by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, which proposed establishing 100 new Sainik Schools under a public-private partnership (PPP) model. This initiative also addresses increasing demand for military education and seeks to maintain regional balance in defense recruitment, taking inspiration from longstanding schools such as Sainik School Purulia, founded in 1962.
Interested institutions can register via the official Ministry of Defence portal, with more information available on the Sainik Schools Society website. The Ministry has urged all eligible entities to participate actively in this initiative to extend the values of discipline, leadership, and patriotism to a broader section of India’s youth.
