The Indian Army has suspended Colonel Ashish Singh Mehta, the commanding officer of an infantry unit, after disciplinary proceedings found him facing 12 charges of irregularities under the Army Act, officials confirmed.
Colonel Mehta, who was commanding the 16th Battalion of the Jat Regiment, has been placed under suspension for 90 days following a hearing conducted at the Rajputana Rifles Regimental Centre. The suspension order was issued by Brigadier Raman Sharma, Commandant of the Regimental Centre As reported by Indian Express:
Nature of Charges
According to sources, Colonel Mehta faces:
- 10 charges under Section 63 of the Army Act, relating to acts prejudicial to good order and military discipline
- 2 charges under Section 45 of the Army Act, pertaining to conduct unbecoming of an officer
The charges reportedly include allegations that the officer attempted to protect a jawan from his unit who was under investigation by the Delhi Area Provost Unit.
Disciplinary Proceedings
The disciplinary action follows directions issued earlier by senior Army commanders. A hearing of charges was conducted on December 5, 2025, during which a summary of evidence was recorded.
The suspension order states that, considering the gravity of the alleged offences, the officer’s “character and conduct as an officer and a gentleman” stand impugned. Exercising powers under Paragraph 349 of the Regulations for the Army, 1987, Colonel Mehta was placed under suspension with effect from December 12, 2025, for an initial period of 90 days. The order is to be reviewed based on progress in the case.
Officer Seeks Review
Sources said Colonel Mehta has submitted a representation to Army authorities challenging the suspension. He has reportedly sought:
- Quashing or withdrawal of the suspension order, claiming it violates the Suspension Policy, 2006
- Certified copies of the court of inquiry proceedings and related file notings
- A declaration that the December 5 hearing be treated as invalid, alleging violation of Army Rule 22
- A fresh and independent re-examination of the court of inquiry, which he claims is based on presumptions rather than admissible evidence
Army’s Stand
Army officials have maintained that due process is being followed strictly in accordance with existing regulations and that the matter remains sub judice under military law. Further action will depend on the outcome of the ongoing disciplinary proceedings.
