Pakistan on Thursday strongly rejected Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s suggestion that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) should oversee Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, calling the statement “irresponsible” and demonstrating a “sheer ignorance” of the IAEA’s mandate.
The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a sharp statement condemning Singh’s remarks, accusing him of revealing “profound insecurity and frustration” over Pakistan’s conventional defence capabilities. “Pakistan’s conventional forces are adequate to deter India without resorting to the so-called ‘nuclear blackmail’ that New Delhi complains about,” the statement added.
Rajnath Singh had made the comments during his first visit to Jammu after Operation Sindoor, addressing Indian troops at Srinagar’s Badami Bagh Cantonment. He questioned the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, calling Pakistan “irresponsible and rogue,” and urged the global nuclear watchdog to bring Islamabad’s nuclear weapons under its supervision.
“The whole world has seen how irresponsibly Pakistan has threatened India,” Singh said. He also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership and the success of Operation Sindoor, as well as the people of Jammu and Kashmir for standing against terrorism and Pakistan’s provocations.
The IAEA responded by confirming there have been no radiation leaks or nuclear incidents reported from any Pakistani facilities. However, the agency has not officially commented on Singh’s call for oversight of Pakistan’s nuclear program.
The International Atomic Energy Agency, based in Vienna, serves as the leading intergovernmental organization promoting safe, secure, and peaceful use of nuclear technology worldwide. Its mandate includes scientific cooperation and monitoring, but it does not traditionally exercise direct control over sovereign states’ nuclear arsenals without specific agreements.
The exchange comes amid heightened tensions following Operation Sindoor and ongoing security challenges along the India-Pakistan border. Pakistan’s leadership, including Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, continues to emphasize conventional deterrence as a cornerstone of its defence posture, rejecting Indian accusations regarding nuclear security.
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is set to launch the Earth Observation Satellite RISAT-1B, also known as EOS-09, aboard the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV-C61) on May 18, 2025. The launch is scheduled for 6:59 am IST from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota.
The mission underscores the enduring significance of the PSLV, widely recognized as ISRO’s most reliable and versatile launch vehicle. Since its first flight in 1993, the PSLV has successfully completed more than 60 missions, placing satellites into a wide range of orbits, including sun-synchronous, geostationary transfer, and sub-geosynchronous transfer orbits.
PSLV’s success lies in its innovative four-stage design, which alternates between solid and liquid propulsion stages. This unique configuration allows for precision payload deployment and has made the rocket ISRO’s workhorse over the decades.
The upcoming PSLV-C61 mission will carry the 1,710 kg EOS-09 satellite into a sun-synchronous orbit. Designed for all-weather, round-the-clock surveillance, the satellite is equipped with a C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR), enabling it to capture high-resolution images regardless of time or weather conditions.
EOS-09 will serve a broad range of applications including national security, border and coastal monitoring, disaster response, flood mapping, agriculture assessment, and forest management. Its advanced radar system offers five distinct imaging modes, capable of switching between ultra-high-resolution imaging for detailed observation and wide-area coverage for broader surveillance.
The PSLV-C61 configuration has been specifically tailored for this heavy payload, showcasing the vehicle’s adaptability to evolving mission requirements. With a proven track record of reliability and cost-effectiveness, the PSLV continues to play a vital role in advancing India’s space capabilities.
As India enhances its space-based infrastructure to address strategic and civilian needs, the EOS-09 mission marks another milestone in ISRO’s efforts to strengthen national security and disaster preparedness through cutting-edge satellite technology.
The BrahMos missile, India’s fastest and most advanced cruise missile, has witnessed a surge in international interest following its successful deployment in Operation Sindoor. The operation, which targeted terror camps in Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, showcased the missile’s pinpoint accuracy and rapid deployment capability, reaffirming India’s prowess in precision-strike warfare.
Developed jointly by India and Russia, the BrahMos missile is a supersonic weapon system capable of being launched from land, sea, and air platforms. It can reach speeds of Mach 3 and typically has a range of 290 km, with upgraded versions extending up to 500 km and even 800 km. The missile’s versatility, combined with its stealth, high accuracy, and powerful warhead capacity of up to 300 kilograms, has made it one of the most sought-after systems in the global arms market.
The Philippines remains the only confirmed buyer to date, having signed a $375 million agreement in January 2022 for three coastal defense batteries. The first was delivered in April 2024, with the second scheduled for delivery in April 2025. However, the recent success of Operation Sindoor has further elevated the system’s reputation and broadened its global appeal.
Currently, 17 countries are in various stages of negotiation for the BrahMos missile system:
Indonesia is pursuing a $200–$350 million deal for an advanced version.
Vietnam is planning a $700 million acquisition for its Army and Navy.
Malaysia is evaluating BrahMos integration into its Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighters and naval vessels.
Thailand, Singapore, and Brunei are exploring purchases to enhance their regional defense capabilities.
Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Venezuela have expressed interest in coastal and naval defense variants.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Oman are in advanced talks, eyeing the missile for regional deterrence.
South Africa and Bulgaria are also in discussions to acquire the system for strategic use.
First tested on June 12, 2001, the BrahMos missile has undergone continuous improvements. Its ability to fly at altitudes from 10 meters to 15 kilometers and to strike targets with remarkable precision has made it a critical component of India’s strike arsenal. The missile’s performance in Operation Sindoor has further cemented its status as a top-tier cruise missile on the international stage.
With rising interest from Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and Eastern Europe, BrahMos has not only reinforced India’s defense capability but also emerged as a key export weapon, positioning India as a significant player in the global arms trade.
In a significant step toward improving welfare services for ex-servicemen, the Indian Army has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Axis Bank and CSC e-Governance to expand Project NAMAN to 25 additional locations across the country. The initiative, spearheaded by the Directorate of Indian Army Veterans, aims to provide seamless pension-related and digital citizen services through SPARSH-enabled Common Service Centres (CSCs) to veterans, their next of kin, and widows.
At the signing ceremony, representatives from the Indian Army, Axis Bank, and CSC e-Governance came together under the banner of Project NAMAN, reaffirming a shared commitment to serving India’s defense community. The event, held in New Delhi, featured both uniformed military personnel and civilian dignitaries, highlighting the cooperation between the armed forces and private sector in supporting veterans.
— Directorate of Indian Army Veterans (@DIAV20) May 15, 2025
Project NAMAN, part of the Indian Army’s ongoing efforts to improve post-retirement welfare, integrates with the Ministry of Defence’s SPARSH platform—System for Pension Administration (Raksha). SPARSH is a digital system designed to streamline pension processing and disbursement for armed forces personnel and defense civilians. With this expansion under Phase II, the initiative will now reach veterans in remote and underserved areas, significantly reducing their dependency on centralized pension offices.
The new CSCs will provide a wide range of services including access to pension entitlements, income tax documents, and grievance redressal. Veterans will also be able to manage their profiles and access real-time pension information via the SPARSH portal, ensuring transparency and timely support.
Axis Bank’s involvement in the project is part of its broader “Power Salute” program, which offers specialized financial services and benefits to defense personnel. Previously, the bank has signed similar agreements with other branches of the armed forces, offering packages that include substantial insurance coverage and educational grants for children. The bank’s participation in Project NAMAN extends these services to Indian Army veterans, reinforcing its support for the military community.
CSC e-Governance Services India Ltd, with its extensive network of digital service centers across rural India, plays a critical role in ensuring last-mile delivery of essential services. Through this partnership, even veterans in distant areas will gain direct access to digital pension services, enhancing inclusivity and convenience.
As of 2025, India has approximately 2.5 million veterans. The expansion of Project NAMAN represents a significant milestone in the nation’s efforts to care for its retired military personnel. The initiative exemplifies how public-private collaboration and digital innovation can together improve service delivery and reaffirm the nation’s gratitude toward its soldiers.
The Indian Army has reiterated its dedication to the motto “Taking Care of Our Own,” signaling an enduring commitment to those who have served. This development not only streamlines pension access but also strengthens the broader ecosystem of veteran support in India.
In a decisive action reflecting rising geopolitical tensions, the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) has revoked the security clearance of Celebi Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd., a Turkish-origin ground handling company, with immediate effect. The move, announced on Thursday, is based on national security considerations and is expected to significantly impact operations at key Indian airports including those in Mumbai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Cochin, and Chennai.
According to the official order issued by BCAS Deputy Director General Sunil Bajpai, the clearance granted to Celebi on November 21, 2022, has been withdrawn in the interest of national security. Celebi handles a range of critical functions such as cargo handling, passenger control, ramp services, and aircraft load management, and currently manages about 70% of ground handling operations at Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The company also operates in high-security zones of several other airports, raising concerns over potential vulnerabilities.
The revocation comes in the wake of heightened tensions between India and Turkey, particularly due to Turkey’s reported military collaboration with Pakistan. Reports suggest that Turkey provided armed drones and logistical support to Pakistan during recent hostilities, including alleged retaliation after India’s Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, which targeted terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Given Celebi’s access to sensitive areas of Indian airports, questions about its continued presence grew more urgent.
The Order Letter
Celebi entered the Indian aviation sector through a joint venture and quickly became a dominant player in ground handling and cargo operations, managing over 540,000 tonnes of cargo annually. The company has also been lauded for its green initiatives at airports, particularly its efforts to curb noise and air pollution. However, the recent geopolitical context and its Turkish ties have placed it under intense scrutiny.
The decision is likely to create short-term disruptions in airport operations. Aviation industry experts have warned that replacing Celebi’s services on short notice could result in higher operational costs, delays, and possibly increased airfares. This development has also sparked broader discussions about India’s dependency on foreign firms for critical infrastructure services.
Political factors have also influenced the outcome. The Shiv Sena recently issued a 10-day ultimatum to Mumbai airport authorities to terminate their engagement with Celebi, citing national security and Turkey’s support to Pakistan. Public sentiment, amplified by media and political discourse, has echoed the demand for tighter regulation of foreign entities operating in strategically sensitive sectors like civil aviation.
As the Indian government weighs operational challenges against national security imperatives, the move to revoke Celebi’s clearance reflects a broader shift toward safeguarding key infrastructure from foreign influence deemed potentially hostile. The path forward may involve strengthening domestic capacity for ground handling operations and revisiting foreign partnerships in critical service sectors.
In a decisive show of strength and preparedness, the Indian Army’s Vajra Corps showcased its combat readiness in the strategically sensitive Ferozepur Sector near the India-Pakistan border. As part of the ongoing Operation Sindoor, the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of Vajra Corps conducted a frontline inspection of troops, underscoring the Corps’ unwavering commitment to national security under its guiding motto, “Nation First, Always and Every Time.”
Photographs released from the inspection depict soldiers in full combat gear, concealed under camouflage netting, prepared for tactical operations. The troops, armed with rifles and heavy weaponry, displayed high alertness and discipline, reflecting the Corps’ intensive training for rapid deployment and immediate response to emerging threats.
Operation Sindoor, as per the Press Information Bureau, involved precise military strikes on terrorist camps, reinforcing India’s proactive stance against cross-border terrorism. The operation is aligned with the mission profile of the Vajra Corps, which plays a crucial role under the Western Command, headquartered at Chandimandir, Haryana. Historically tasked with safeguarding India’s western frontier, the Command includes key formations like the II Corps (Ambala), IX Corps (Yol), and the 40th Artillery Division, forming a formidable defensive network.
The Ferozepur visit comes shortly after a comprehensive assessment of operational preparedness by Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi, who recently reviewed the readiness of both Vajra and Dagger Divisions. The Vajra Division has been focusing on real-time surveillance enhancements, development of mobility corridors, and execution of force dispersal drills designed for “day-zero deployment”—where troops must be battle-ready within minutes of any threat.
Raised in 1950 in Ambala and relocated to Jalandhar in 1951, the Vajra Corps has a rich legacy of frontline operations in volatile border zones. It remains a critical pillar in India’s defense infrastructure, especially in Punjab, a region marked by geopolitical sensitivity.
This latest display of combat readiness sends a clear strategic message: the Indian Army stands vigilant and capable, maintaining a high state of alert in defense of national sovereignty. The exercise resonates with global counter-terrorism principles, including those championed by NATO, which stress proactive threat neutralization and robust border defense mechanisms. India’s approach, embodied by operations like Sindoor, signals its dedication to these shared security goals while adapting to the dynamic challenges of modern warfare.
In a focused effort to bolster security in the sensitive border belt of Jammu and Kashmir, senior commanders of the Indian Army conducted a thorough operational review in the Narian, JWG, and Totagali sectors—areas known for frequent infiltration attempts and terrorist activity near the Line of Control (LoC) with Pakistan.
The General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the White Knight Corps (XVI Corps), accompanied by the GOC of Romeo Force, visited these strategically important sectors in the twin districts of Poonch and Rajouri. The officers interacted with troops deployed on the ground, appreciating their professionalism, vigilance, and dedication in high-risk environments.
The senior leadership emphasized the need for “razor-sharp readiness” and high morale to counter emerging threats effectively. Their visit comes at a time when the Jammu region has witnessed a 20% rise in terror-related incidents in 2024 compared to the previous year, as reported by the South Asia Terrorism Portal.
He applauded the troops’ grit and professionalism, and called for razor-sharp readiness and high morale to counter terror and ensure peace in the… pic.twitter.com/x0LE6HTVPL
— White Knight Corps (@Whiteknight_IA) May 14, 2025
The sectors visited fall under the command of the Romeo Force, a counter-insurgency unit of the Rashtriya Rifles raised in 1990 specifically to manage internal security challenges in Jammu and Kashmir. Operating under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), the Romeo Force has played a key role in counter-terrorism operations, although the use of AFSPA continues to spark debate due to concerns over alleged human rights violations.
This operational assessment is part of the Indian Army’s broader campaign to stabilize the region and deter cross-border terrorism. Historical operations such as Operation Sarp Vinash in 2003, which neutralized 64 terrorists in the Pir Panjal range, underscore the Army’s long-standing commitment to rooting out insurgency from these areas.
Alongside combat operations, the Army continues to engage with civilians through initiatives like Operation Sadbhavana. These efforts include educational programs for children, vocational training for women, and the provision of artificial limbs to victims of militancy through local organizations such as the Pritam Spiritual Foundation in Poonch.
The latest review by top military leadership reflects a dual approach—enhancing operational preparedness and building community trust—as tensions along the LoC remain high. With persistent cross-border threats and internal security challenges, the Indian Army remains committed to ensuring peace while supporting the socio-economic development of the region.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has confirmed that there has been no radiation leak or nuclear release from any facility in Pakistan following India’s recent military offensive, Operation Sindoor. The statement, aimed at quelling speculation of a nuclear incident, follows days of heightened global concern after Indian precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
In an official communication, the IAEA stated: “Based on the information available to the IAEA, there has been no radiation leak or release from any nuclear facility in Pakistan.” The announcement comes amid reports suggesting potential strikes near Kirana Hills in Sargodha—a site long associated with Pakistan’s nuclear weapons development.
The Indian Air Force, however, categorically denied targeting any nuclear installations. Air Marshal A.K. Bharti, Director General of Air Operations, told reporters on May 12, “We have not hit Kirana Hills, whatever is there,” adding with irony, “Thank you for telling us Kirana Hills houses nuclear installations.”
Operation Sindoor was India’s retaliation for a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed 26 lives, including a Nepali citizen. The operation involved airstrikes on May 7 across nine terror-linked sites, including radar stations and communication hubs, leading to Pakistan’s failed counter-strikes from May 8–10. The escalation ended with a ceasefire agreement brokered during DGMO-level talks on May 10.
Despite India’s clarification, international anxiety was fueled by the reported presence of a U.S. Nuclear Emergency Support Team aircraft near Pakistani airspace and the alleged arrival of an Egyptian military plane carrying boron—a chemical often used to mitigate radiation effects. These movements prompted theories of a nuclear leak, with some foreign analysts suggesting a strike may have impacted sensitive areas.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump added to the narrative by asserting that American diplomacy had helped avert a nuclear disaster. “We stopped a nuclear conflict. I think it could have been a bad nuclear war. Millions could have died,” Trump said, crediting Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for their efforts.
Pakistan’s nuclear program remains outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has long operated under a veil of secrecy. While some civilian nuclear facilities are under IAEA safeguards—such as the Karachi Coastal reactors—the agency does not monitor Pakistan’s military nuclear sites, where the risk of operational or accidental hazards remains a concern.
The IAEA’s confirmation provides short-term relief, but the incident has reignited global scrutiny over Pakistan’s nuclear security—especially amid military conflicts. As both nations observe a fragile truce, the international community has called for greater transparency, clearer civilian-military separation, and enhanced nuclear safety protocols in the volatile South Asian region.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday issued a direct call for international oversight of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, urging the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to intervene. Speaking in Srinagar’s Badami Bagh Cantonment, Singh questioned the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, labeling the neighbouring country as “irresponsible” and “rogue” in the wake of its recent threats during the largest military confrontation between the two nations in nearly three decades.
“The world knows that our army’s aim is accurate, and when they hit the target, they leave the counting to the enemy. How strong is India’s pledge against terrorism today can be known from the fact that we did not even care about their nuclear blackmail,” Singh said to Indian troops stationed in Kashmir.
In a stern message from the ground zero of recent cross-border hostilities, Singh asserted, “I want to raise this question—are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of such an irresponsible and rogue nation? I believe the IAEA must take charge of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.”
The defence minister’s remarks came during his first visit to Jammu and Kashmir since the culmination of Operation Sindoor, a retaliatory Indian military campaign that began with precision strikes on May 7 against Pakistan-based terror infrastructure. Pakistan responded with a series of attempted strikes on May 8, 9, and 10, targeting Indian military bases. However, India swiftly retaliated by launching missile strikes against eight Pakistani airbases on May 10.
The crisis de-escalated following high-level military talks between the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both countries later that day.
Singh praised the Indian armed forces and PM Narendra Modi’s leadership for the success of the operation. “I may be your defence minister, but first I am a citizen of India. The entire country is proud of what you did under the leadership of our Prime Minister. The people of Jammu and Kashmir have shown their anger against terrorism with unity and courage,” he said.
During his two-day visit, Singh will receive detailed briefings from senior military officials at the XV Corps headquarters in Srinagar to assess the prevailing security situation and review the combat readiness of frontline forces along the Line of Control and International Border.
The visit underlines New Delhi’s assertive stance in the region and signals a shift in tone amid rising global concerns about nuclear stability in South Asia.
Balochistan, a vast and resource-rich province in southwestern Pakistan, borders Iran, Afghanistan, and the Arabian Sea. Despite making up nearly 44% of Pakistan’s land area, it houses only around 6% of the country’s population. The region holds significant geopolitical importance due to its abundant natural resources, strategic location along key trade routes, and the presence of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), particularly the Gwadar port. Recently, the Balochistan issue has gained renewed attention amidst rising India-Pakistan tensions, military developments such as Operation Sindoor, and escalating international concerns over human rights violations in the province.
Recently, Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch declared Balochistan’s independence from Pakistan on Wednesday, marking a pivotal moment in the region’s turbulent history. He appealed to the international community — especially India — to recognize Balochistan as a sovereign nation and to support their cause diplomatically and politically.
Balochistan’s location makes it central to regional geopolitics. It borders Iran and Afghanistan, has a long Arabian Sea coastline, and lies at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East. The Gwadar port, a flagship CPEC project, provides China and Pakistan with direct access to the Indian Ocean, further amplifying the province’s strategic value.
Balochistan on Map
The roots of Balochistan’s conflict date back to 1948 when Pakistan annexed the region, overriding resistance from the local leadership. The Khan of Kalat, Balochistan’s ruler at the time, was reportedly coerced into signing the instrument of accession. This controversial integration sparked widespread resentment and a cycle of insurgencies that continue to this day. Baloch nationalist groups have consistently accused the Pakistani state of systemic marginalization, resource exploitation, and violent repression.
Balochistan’s Flag
Multiple Baloch nationalist groups, such as the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and Baloch Republican Army (BRA), advocate for either greater autonomy or full independence. These groups have targeted Pakistani military installations and Chinese-backed infrastructure projects, citing both political disenfranchisement and economic exploitation as primary grievances.
BLA Members
Pakistan has responded with recurring military operations across Balochistan. These operations have led to widespread allegations of human rights abuses, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture. Rather than quelling dissent, these measures have often intensified the local population’s alienation and strengthened the insurgency.
India’s Present Stance
India has historically maintained a policy of non-intervention and respect for the territorial sovereignty of neighboring states. However, a notable shift occurred in 2016 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi referenced Balochistan during his Independence Day address, signaling an intention to internationalize the issue. Despite this rhetorical support, India has not formally recognized Balochistan’s independence nor provided direct assistance to its separatist movements. Its engagement remains confined to diplomatic expression and limited humanitarian advocacy.
People Fighting for their Rights
Arguments in Favor of Recognition
Strategic Counterbalance: Recognizing Balochistan could serve as a counter-strategy to Pakistan’s position on Kashmir and its alleged support for anti-India militancy, thereby offering New Delhi a form of strategic reciprocity.
Humanitarian Rationale: Continued reports of atrocities and repression in Balochistan strengthen the moral case for India to support the Baloch people’s right to self-determination.
Regional Stabilization: Advocates suggest that an independent, secular Balochistan could act as a stabilizing buffer in a geopolitically volatile region.
Democratic Principles: Supporting oppressed communities aligns with India’s democratic ethos and its commitment to human rights.
Baloch Extremists Bombing Pakistani Soldiers
Arguments Against Recognition
Violation of International Law: Recognizing Balochistan would contravene the principles of state sovereignty and territorial integrity enshrined in international law, potentially weakening India’s own positions on territorial disputes.
Diplomatic Fallout: Such a move could strain India’s relationships with global partners who uphold the sanctity of national borders and could tarnish India’s global image.
Domestic Repercussions: Supporting separatism abroad could embolden internal secessionist movements within India, such as those in Kashmir or the Northeast.
Risk of Escalation: Open recognition could provoke severe retaliation from Pakistan, heightening the risk of military confrontation.
Geopolitical Complexity: Iran, which has its own Baloch population, may view the move with suspicion. Similarly, it could antagonize China, given CPEC’s strategic and economic importance to Beijing.
Mass Protest by Baloch People
International Perspective
Globally, major powers and institutions—including the UN, US, and EU—recognize Balochistan as part of Pakistan. While human rights concerns are occasionally raised, there is little international appetite for endorsing separatist claims. Historical analogies with regions like Kosovo, Palestine, Taiwan, or Tibet demonstrate that recognition often hinges on political expediency rather than legal consistency. In practice, the principle of territorial integrity generally outweighs calls for secession.
Strategic Alternatives for India
Given the risks of formal recognition, India may consider a calibrated approach:
Diplomatic Advocacy: Continue raising human rights issues in Balochistan through international platforms to exert pressure on Pakistan.
Support for Civil Society: Channel assistance to human rights organizations and independent media documenting the situation on the ground.
Covert Engagement: Explore discreet diplomatic or intelligence-based measures that avoid overt recognition while subtly supporting Baloch voices.
Diaspora Mobilization: Utilize think tanks, media outlets, and the global Baloch diaspora to internationalize the issue and build global awareness.
Conclusion
The prospect of recognizing Balochistan’s independence poses a complex dilemma for India. While the move may offer strategic leverage and moral justification, it carries significant legal, diplomatic, and security risks. A more pragmatic course would involve raising the issue diplomatically, supporting human rights initiatives, and subtly influencing global opinion without breaching international norms. India’s response must carefully balance its moral imperatives with strategic foresight, upholding its values without compromising regional stability or national interes
