Home Blog Page 37

India Cuts Defence Import Dependency from 11% to 4% in 14 Years

0

India has significantly reduced its reliance on foreign defence imports, bringing down its import dependency from 11% in 2011 to just 4% in 2025, according to a recent ANI report. This dramatic shift is being hailed as a major milestone in India’s journey toward self-reliance, driven by flagship government programs such as “Make in India” and “Aatmanirbhar Bharat.”

Since the fiscal year 2014–15, India’s domestic defence production has grown by an impressive 174%, reaching a historic high of ₹1.27 lakh crore ($16 billion) in FY 2023–24. In the same period, the Ministry of Defence signed 193 contracts worth over ₹2.09 lakh crore, with 92% of these deals going to Indian companies.

India’s defence export profile has also transformed remarkably. From negligible figures a decade ago, exports soared 30 times over to ₹21,083 crore in 2023–24. Indian defence products are now being exported to over 100 countries, demonstrating growing global trust in the quality and reliability of indigenous systems.

Crucial enablers of this transformation include the launch of the SRIJAN portal, which fosters industry participation by listing import-replacement opportunities, and the Positive Indigenisation Lists, which now feature over 14,000 items earmarked for domestic production.

Looking ahead, the government aims to scale defence production to ₹3 lakh crore and exports to ₹50,000 crore by 2029. Experts believe India is on course to become not only a self-reliant defence power but also a globally competitive defence exporter.

With robust policy reforms, increased private sector participation, and the emergence of defence corridors, India is entering a new era of strategic autonomy, technological innovation, and military-industrial strength.

Indian Army Places Order for 450 More Nagastra-1R Loitering Munitions

0

The Indian Army has placed an additional order for 450 Nagastra-1R loitering munitions from Solar Defence and Aerospace Limited, signaling growing trust in homegrown defense technologies. This procurement comes just a year after the initial delivery of 480 units in June 2024 under the Army’s Emergency Procurement Powers, indicating the operational effectiveness of these systems in real-world conditions.

Developed by Economic Explosives Ltd (EEL), a subsidiary of Solar Industries, the Nagastra-1R loitering munition—often dubbed a “suicide drone”—is designed for precise strikes with minimal collateral damage. It boasts GPS-enabled guidance with a circular error probable (CEP) of just 2 meters, allowing it to accurately neutralize enemy targets such as bunkers, vehicles, and radar systems.

The system features a 360-degree gimbal camera, enabling full situational awareness and reconnaissance, and offers thermal imaging capabilities for effective night operations. Uniquely, the drone can abort missions mid-flight and be recovered using a parachute system, ensuring resource conservation when necessary.

Over 80% of the components in the Nagastra-1R are indigenously sourced, aligning with India’s ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ and ‘Make in India’ initiatives. It was tested extensively in challenging terrains, including Ladakh and Babina, and passed all operational evaluations, including pre-delivery inspections.

With this new order, the Indian Army aims to bolster its tactical strike capabilities, reduce dependence on foreign systems, and modernize its drone warfare strategy. The continued induction of Nagastra-1R marks a significant step in India’s journey toward becoming a global hub for advanced, self-reliant defense manufacturing.

India Debunks Claims of U.S. Using Its Airspace for Operation Midnight Hammer

0

The Press Information Bureau’s (PIB) Fact Check unit has officially denied claims that the United States used Indian airspace to carry out airstrikes on Iran during its June 21 assault, codenamed Operation Midnight Hammer. The operation, aimed at targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, has sparked a wave of misinformation online, including allegations of Indian complicity.

According to General Dan Caine, Chair of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, the mission involved 125 aircraft and executed decoy maneuvers over the Pacific Ocean. Pentagon briefings confirm that the B-2 bombers and support aircraft were launched from bases within the continental United States.

Social media posts and unverified outlets had claimed that the U.S. aircraft passed through Indian airspace, accusing New Delhi of “silent support” for the operation. However, Indian authorities clarified that such a route is geographically implausible. India does not border Iran and any trajectory would require overflight of Pakistan, an adversarial nation that the U.S. routinely avoids in high-risk military operations.

Experts believe the false narrative may have originated from misinformation networks tied to regional rivalries. “It appears to be an attempt to drag India into a volatile situation unnecessarily,” said a senior geopolitical analyst.

India’s airspace is divided into four Flight Information Regions (FIRs) – Chennai, Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata – none of which were involved in or alerted for any such overflight activity.

The PIB has called on the public to remain vigilant and avoid spreading unverified claims, especially amid heightened tensions in the Middle East. While the government has not yet announced action against those behind the disinformation, calls for accountability are growing among cyber and national security experts.

With no official reaction from Tehran regarding the debunked claim, India continues to monitor regional developments closely, prioritizing verified communication and geopolitical stability.

Operation Midnight Hammer: The Largest US Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Sites

0

In a historic military operation, the United States launched a powerful and meticulously coordinated airstrike named Operation Midnight Hammer, targeting Iran’s most sensitive nuclear facilities. The overnight strikes, ordered by President Donald Trump, hit three critical sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—with unprecedented precision and firepower, marking a pivotal moment in US-Iran tensions.

The Strike

Operation Midnight Hammer was led by seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, which dropped fourteen GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators—30,000-pound bombs designed to destroy fortified underground facilities—on Fordow and Natanz. These facilities, buried deep within mountains, were central to Iran’s uranium enrichment program.

Complementing the aerial assault, US Navy submarines launched Tomahawk cruise missiles on the Isfahan site, reportedly targeting highly enriched uranium stockpiles. The entire operation mobilized over 125 aircraft, including support units like in-air refueling tankers and surveillance aircraft, making it the largest B-2 bomber deployment in US history and the second-largest globally.

Military planners executed a complex strategy of deception, sending decoy aircraft westward into the Pacific, while the real strike force flew east, evading Iranian detection systems. All aircraft returned safely, with no engagement from Iranian air defense systems, underscoring the mission’s precision and surprise.

Iran’s Reaction

Iran confirmed the strikes but sought to downplay their impact. State broadcaster official Hassan Abedini claimed key nuclear materials had already been moved. Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization condemned the operation as a “barbaric violation of international law.”

Within hours of the strikes, Iran launched missiles at Tel Aviv and Haifa, injuring over 80 people. While seen as a swift show of force, many analysts believe a more calculated Iranian retaliation is likely in the days ahead. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi warned of serious consequences and accused the US of dragging the region into conflict after failing in diplomacy.

Diplomatic Collapse and Road to the Strike

Before resorting to military action, Washington made several attempts to revive diplomacy, including five rounds of talks led by US envoy Steve Witkoff. But with Iran’s nuclear program accelerating and no agreement in sight, the Pentagon prepared the surgical operation to reset the regional balance.

President Trump, addressing the nation following the strikes, warned Tehran that the US has many more targets and would not hesitate to act again. “Nuclear ambiguity is unacceptable,” he said, adding that the mission was a message to both allies and adversaries of America’s resolve.

Global Reaction and Strategic Fallout

The strike drew swift and diverse reactions. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres labeled it a “dangerous escalation,” while Russia blamed the US for instigating a new war. India, Saudi Arabia, and Oman called for restraint, emphasizing the need to avoid further destabilization in the Middle East.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, while acknowledging the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions, stressed the need for de-escalation and diplomacy. Many experts warned that even if infrastructure is destroyed, Iran’s scientific knowledge remains, and such operations can only delay—not eliminate—nuclear capability.

What Lies Ahead

With Iran vowing retaliation and the global community bracing for the consequences, Operation Midnight Hammer could become a defining moment in the US-Iran standoff. It showcases America’s unmatched ability to project power, but also reopens questions about the limits of military deterrence in stopping nuclear proliferation.

As the world watches, all eyes are now on Tehran’s next move—and whether diplomacy can still salvage what remains of regional stability.

How the Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Could Impact India’s Energy and Economy?

0

Following U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, Iran’s Parliament has approved a proposal to close the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic oil transit chokepoint. The decision marks a dangerous escalation in the already tense West Asian geopolitical landscape. For India—heavily reliant on energy imports from the Gulf—the potential blockade of this maritime corridor raises pressing concerns around economic stability, energy security, and regional strategy.

Also Read: Iranian Parliament Approves Measure to Close Strait of Hormuz After U.S. Strikes

What Is the Strait of Hormuz and Why It Matters

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow maritime passage between Iran and Oman, connecting the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea. It is one of the world’s most vital energy corridors, with roughly 20-30% of global oil exports and over one-third of liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments flowing through it. Any disruption here directly affects energy-hungry economies, especially in Asia.

1 8

India’s Energy Dependence on the Gulf

India imports over 80% of its crude oil, and nearly two-thirds of this comes from the Gulf region—including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Iran. A significant portion of this supply transits via the Strait of Hormuz. For example, Qatar supplies about 39% of India’s LNG imports through long-term contracts. Additionally, petrochemicals, fertilizers like urea, and other energy-linked goods also flow through this route, tying India’s industrial ecosystem closely to Gulf supply chains.

The Economic Fallout

A closure of the Strait would likely send global crude oil prices soaring, putting India under immediate inflationary pressure. The impact would ripple across key sectors—fuel, transport, manufacturing, aviation, and agriculture—raising input costs and straining the fiscal deficit and current account balance. Although India has recently benefited from lower oil prices and built up strategic reserves, a prolonged disruption would test its economic resilience, especially in the wake of post-COVID recovery and global trade uncertainties.

Strategic and Naval Concerns

India maintains a strong naval presence in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Aden, including mission-based deployments to safeguard energy lanes. The Indian Navy, through operations like Operation Sankalp, ensures maritime security and can evacuate Indian nationals if required. A Strait closure would escalate the complexity of such operations, endanger India’s seaborne trade, and put pressure on naval and diplomatic resources.

Impact on Indian Diaspora and Trade

With over 9 million Indians residing in the Gulf and annual remittances exceeding $40 billion, any instability in the region could affect both economic and humanitarian dimensions. India’s bilateral trade with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries exceeds $150 billion. Disruptions in maritime logistics would hinder trade flows, affect small and medium exporters, and impact the well-being of Indian expatriates.

India’s Diplomatic Balancing Act

India has traditionally walked a fine line between its ties with Iran, the U.S., Israel, and the Arab world, guided by a policy of strategic autonomy. In past regional conflicts—such as after the 2020 assassination of General Qasem Soleimani—India maintained a neutral position. A similar approach is likely now, with India focusing on silent diplomacy, urging restraint, and working to safeguard its strategic and economic interests without taking sides.

Oil Alternatives and Strategic Buffers

India has made strides in diversifying its oil sources, including increasing imports from West Africa, the U.S., and Russia. Its strategic petroleum reserves (SPR), maintained under the Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Ltd. (ISPRL), can sustain the country for several weeks during short-term crises. While the long-term transition to renewables is progressing, fossil fuel dependency remains high, particularly for industrial and transport sectors.

Global Domino Effects and Indo-Pacific Fallout

The Strait of Hormuz’s closure won’t just affect India—it will rattle global markets. Countries like China, Japan, and South Korea, which also rely heavily on Gulf energy, would face supply shocks. Rising maritime insurance premiums, shipping delays, and higher logistics costs would compound problems, affecting global supply chains and posing broader risks across the Indo-Pacific strategic architecture.

Conclusion

India may not be directly involved in the US-Iran conflict, but a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would severely impact its energy lifelines, economic stability, and strategic calculus. This moment reinforces the urgency for India to:

  • Strengthen its strategic petroleum reserves
  • Accelerate its energy diversification and green transition
  • Deepen regional cooperation on maritime security
  • Uphold balanced diplomacy amid intensifying global rivalries

Also Read: India Assures Fuel Supply Stability Amid Iran’s Strait of Hormuz Closure Threat

As the Gulf simmers, India must prepare not just for today’s crisis, but for long-term resilience in a world where energy and geopolitics are increasingly intertwined.

Pakistan and Muslim Nations Condemn US Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

0

Pakistan has strongly condemned the recent United States military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, labeling them as violations of international law and norms. The attacks, which targeted Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz, were reportedly aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear program. In a statement issued by Pakistan’s Foreign Office, the government expressed deep concern about the potential for regional escalation and emphasized Iran’s legitimate right to self-defense under the United Nations Charter.

The statement also called for the protection of civilian lives and infrastructure, urging all parties involved to adhere to the principles of international humanitarian law. Pakistan underscored the need for diplomacy and dialogue as the only sustainable paths to resolving such crises.

This condemnation came shortly after Pakistan had announced its backing of US President Donald Trump’s nomination for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. The timing of the condemnation has drawn attention, reflecting the complex and evolving nature of Pakistan’s foreign policy in the region.

Pakistan’s opposition party, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI), also issued a separate statement denouncing the US action. The PTI accused the United States of breaching Iranian sovereignty and alleged that Israel had influenced Washington’s decision to launch the strikes, despite what it called a lack of conclusive evidence regarding Iran’s nuclear weapons capability. PTI leaders pointed fingers at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, blaming him for escalating tensions in the Middle East.

Several other Muslim-majority nations echoed Pakistan’s concerns. Saudi Arabia reiterated its rejection of violations against Iranian sovereignty, while Qatar warned of grave regional and international consequences if the situation deteriorates further. Iraq and Oman also joined the chorus of countries calling for restraint and a return to diplomatic solutions.

The broad condemnation from across the Islamic world highlights growing unease over the potential fallout of renewed US-Iran hostilities and signals a unified call for restraint and respect for international norms in an already volatile region.

India Assures Fuel Supply Stability Amid Iran’s Strait of Hormuz Closure Threat

0

Amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, Union Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has assured Indian citizens that the country’s energy supply remains stable despite Iran’s threat to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

The development comes after Iran’s Parliament approved a proposal to close the narrow waterway following U.S. airstrikes on its nuclear sites. The final decision on implementing the closure, however, rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

“The geopolitical situation in the Middle East has been under our close observation for the past two weeks,” Puri said. “Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, we have diversified our energy sources over the years. A significant share of our crude oil no longer passes through the Strait of Hormuz.”

He added that India’s oil marketing companies (OMCs) have reserves for several weeks and are continuing to receive supplies via multiple global routes. “All necessary steps are being taken to ensure uninterrupted fuel access to our citizens,” Puri stated in a post on social platform X.

Industry sources, however, remain cautious. “Oil and gas are extremely sensitive sectors. Even short-term disruptions can result in sharp price hikes,” a senior official told NDTV Profit. “If the Strait remains closed for more than a week, global markets could face severe shocks. India too will not remain unaffected.”

While India has increased crude imports from Russia in recent months, experts say the benefits depend on evolving price trends and discount margins. The government is reportedly considering excise duty cuts on fuel if crude prices breach the $105 per barrel mark.

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital chokepoint for global energy flows, handling nearly 20% of the world’s oil and gas trade. With the situation in flux, India’s preparedness and diversification strategies will be tested in the coming days.

Army Jawan and Accomplice Arrested for Leaking Sensitive Information to Pakistan’s ISI

0
Made with AI for Representation Only.

In a major counter-espionage breakthrough, Amritsar Rural Police have arrested an Indian Army jawan and his civilian accomplice for allegedly leaking confidential military information to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The accused have been identified as Gurpreet Singh alias Gopy Foji, a serving jawan of the Sikh Regiment stationed in Jammu, and Sahil Masih alias Shali, both residents of Dhariwal in Punjab’s Amritsar district.

According to Director General of Police (DGP) Gaurav Yadav, preliminary investigations revealed that Gurpreet Singh was in direct contact with ISI handlers and had been passing on sensitive information using pen drives. The espionage link was reportedly established through a Dubai-based drug trafficker named Arjan, also from Dhariwal, who introduced Gurpreet to ISI operatives around five months ago.

Police have recovered two mobile phones containing virtual numbers used to communicate with Pakistani handlers. Gurpreet is suspected of collecting, storing, and transmitting confidential military data to the ISI using covert drop-off methods. His actions were allegedly rewarded with monetary compensation routed through a web of intermediaries, including friends, relatives, and overseas contacts to avoid financial scrutiny.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Amritsar Rural, Maninder Singh, stated that the arrests were made during an intelligence-led operation as the duo attempted another data handover. Gurpreet, who joined the Army in 2016, allegedly exploited his official access to systematically share classified military information. He received funds through a layered network designed to evade detection.

A case has been registered against the accused under sections 3, 5, and 9 of the Official Secrets Act and section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita at Lopoke police station. Further investigations are ongoing to identify the full extent of the espionage network and trace other domestic and foreign collaborators.

All Three Pahalgam Attackers Were Pakistani Nationals, Says NIA

0

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has concluded that all three terrorists involved in the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam were Pakistani nationals affiliated with the proscribed Lashkar-e-Taiba outfit. This revelation follows the arrest of two Kashmiri residents who allegedly provided food, shelter, and logistical support to the attackers.

According to officials, the terrorists had visited the homes of Parvaiz Ahmad Jothar and Bashir Ahmad Jothar in Pahalgam days before the attack and were harboured at a seasonal dhok (hut) in Hill Park. “They came on the evening of April 20, requested food, paid some money, and warned the hosts not to inform anyone,” said a source familiar with the investigation. The NIA has arrested the duo under Section 19 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

The breakthrough contradicts the initial narrative by the Jammu and Kashmir Police, who had released sketches of three suspects — two Pakistani nationals and one believed to be a local. NIA sources now assert that the individuals in those sketches were misidentified and not involved in the Pahalgam attack.

Investigators believe one of the attackers was Suleiman Shah, previously linked to the killing of seven tunnel construction workers in October 2024. His name has also surfaced in other high-profile cases, including attacks on Army personnel in Kulgam and Jammu’s Poonch district.

Over 200 individuals, including pony operators, shopkeepers, and photographers, were questioned in the course of the investigation. Visual identification of the attackers was further corroborated by local witnesses after central agencies showed them previously unreleased photographs found on the phone of a deceased militant.

The NIA is now cross-referencing ballistic data from earlier attacks to build a comprehensive case against the trio. The agency emphasized that its findings reinforce the cross-border origins of terrorism in Kashmir and expose Pakistan’s continued use of non-state actors to destabilize the region.

Iranian Parliament Approves Measure to Close Strait of Hormuz After U.S. Strikes

0

Iran’s parliament has approved a proposal to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation to recent U.S. airstrikes on three key nuclear facilities within its territory. The strategic move, if implemented, could disrupt nearly 20% of the global oil and gas supply, heightening geopolitical tensions and raising fears of an energy crisis.

The final authority to enforce the closure lies with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. According to Press TV and parliamentary national security commission member Esmail Kosari, the council is currently deliberating the measure.

The Strait of Hormuz, located between Oman and Iran, is a narrow maritime chokepoint just 21 miles wide at its narrowest. It serves as a vital conduit for energy exports from the Gulf region to international markets. Any disruption to this route would have immediate and significant implications for global energy security.

In response to the developments, the United States has urged China to use its diplomatic influence to dissuade Iran from executing the closure. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any such move would constitute a major escalation, necessitating a strong international response. Despite the rising tensions, Rubio reiterated that Washington remains open to dialogue with Tehran.

The closure of the Strait would likely send shockwaves through global markets, potentially driving up oil prices and triggering volatility across financial systems. As the international community monitors the situation closely, diplomatic channels—particularly involving China—are expected to play a crucial role in averting further escalation.